There is a video there that says it shows scientists being silenced by the government. I always see people sharing it when they say things like "What do you think about this?" or "I don't know if this is okay, but you have to listen." If you want to learn more but are wary of being deceived, write me this.
The video is the "first part" of an upcoming movie called The plague, and contains one interview between film composer and scientist Judy Mikovits. He says the COVID-19 epidemic was somehow created in the lab or allowed to spread intentionally (his story changes slightly). There are a few subtle facts here, but almost all of the practical advice – whether wearing a mask or receiving a vaccine, for example – is backed up by accident. If you are having trouble finding you to trust this video, or any information that is true and false, we will take it down for you.
Great facts
Before we get into any details, let's talk about the speculation that underpins the appeal of this video. For one thing: money drives many things in the country. And Big Pharma has more potential than it can.
The video portrays the US government as dishonest, a statement I think everyone can agree on, even though people of different political parties may have different ideas about which parts of the government they trust.
The biggest truth that I think this video has to do with it is that we, the public, hear confusing and conflicting messages about the disease. We are living in something we have never seen before, and many things about it are absurd. That's unavoidable – it's new in the world. But it also makes us yearn for certainty, and no one can be blamed for wanting to get explicit messages.
G / O Media may receive a commission
But as we've discussed here before, real experts discuss the uncertainty of facts about our situation. No living person today can have 100 answers, so we must always doubt anyone who can explain them all.
We wish to be sure. We may want to hear facts that confirm our choices, or things that make us feel in control of what is happening in the world. We are hungry for anything that can make this moment in our lives feel a little less. Remember, if seek
Important background
The video was made professionally. It looks like a text. It lasts about the first 10 minutes to set up Mikovits as an expert in his persecuted and silenced sector. When she first spoke about COVID-19, we have come to know her and have been with her.
Someone who made a technical document would look at his claims as he did, and was interviewing more than one person for different ideas, so this is our first indication that things might not be as they seem. (We reached out to the production company to ask how they paid for his claim, and we will review this part if they respond.)
One of the most important things to ask about a piece of media is where it came from, who made it, and tracked the revenue in both directions. Who paid for this? And who benefits?
I hope that in the coming weeks we will learn more about who posted and sponsored the video, but so far that little information has been made public. We know that Mikovits, the scientist interviewed, is selling a the book that's currently the best seller at # 1
His book was published in partnership with Children & # 39; s Health Defense, an organization led by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Its website it has ideas for anti-science strategy, including strong claims vaccines and cell towers give children Alzheimer's disease. It is often asked a questionnaire calls the flock's infection "unreasonable" and says it is "debatable" whether vaccines save lives. These are false statements.
So is this anti-vaxxer propaganda? It looks like it's coming from that background, but in the video, the interviewer asks Mikovits if he is "anti-vaccine" and he says no. To the average viewer, that would seem to strengthen us. But if you've spent any time listening to anti-vaxxers, you know it's a big red fl ag. "I do not ban the vaccine but …" is the scientific rejection of "I am not a racist but …"
And one quick note before we get into the content of the Plandemic video. Sometimes people ask me where they are mine money comes from. I have been accused of being a “shill” for various purposes when writing controversial articles. So be clear: About 98% of your income comes from being the author of this website. Everything else is by check in the royal time book. My books are open and a historical epidemic and basic genes. My position on controversial topics does not affect sales numbers in any way.
The goal of the company and trained morals I've admitted that I've allowed the subject or source of my story to influence the story itself, and I can't accept the money to make the cover. There is a "fire extinguisher" between the advertising section of the company and my people, editors, journalists. I have no dog in this fight. I just want people to be healthy and to have a good experience, and I follow the facts where they take me. I'm now sharing them with you.
How much is Mikovits' backstory true?
Impartial reporting addresses a very different issue than the Plandemic-related background version. This is the latest Washington Post article it helps if you want to learn more about him.
Earlier in his career, Mikovits published what the video calls a "blockbuster" claiming that chronic fatigue syndrome is caused by a virus. Later on that came about other labs could not replicate their results, and his own lab could not replicate it. The title was withdrawn. But Mikovits went on to say that viruses cause a variety of chronic diseases, including autism, and that they are found in vaccines. There is no evidence of his claims.
Some aspects of her story are exaggerated (or worse) for telling stories in this video. The Plandemic situation shows the SWAT team when Mikovits talks about being detained without a warrant from unrelated events and the news media at the time said that he he defended himself.
The events he participates in are well documented in the news media and scientific journals of the time; here is a 1985 article from Science the debate over who confirmed the HIV results in the first place. (There is no reason to believe that publication delays are costly, as he says.)
But that's enough for Mikovits. Is what he says true?
Does the COVID-19 virus show signs of lab creation?
No. There are many coronaviruses, and scientists have known that from time to time, a single-germ virus can eventually infect another (like humans) with minimal genetic mutations. There is no reason to believe, as Mikovits says, that it will take "800 years" of evolution. Many pandemics have emerged as a result of human-to-animal spillover. Sars, MERS, Ebola and many flu viruses (including 1918 and 2009) are just a few of these, and scientists have been warning for decades that there is always someone else in place. Here is an excellent 2012 book by David Quammen which follows several groups of scientists who study these events and who try to predict and understand where they might happen next.
Yes, there is a lab in Wuhan, China, that studies coronaviruses. It was developed after the outbreak of the Sars disease (also caused by a coronavirus) and yes, the US was financially supportive, because if you have a desire to prevent a pandemic, the only thing you can do is support the study of the same species. of viruses that have caused a huge epidemic in the past. There is nothing heated about this.
Scientists have multiplying debt the notion that the virus is synthetic. Its type shows a clear relation to animal pathogens, too not coronavirus samples from the Wuhan lab.
Is Dr. Fauci the mastermind behind it?
Mikovits keeps dropping Fauci's name, but he actually doesn't connect in any way to the material he tells. A man drives a great government agency; it's not like he's been in the office next to him bringing his belongings.
Listen carefully to his name throughout the video and you'll see what I mean. Not connected to anything. For example, Mikovits says Fauci filmed the (obscure) cover, saying that people were "paid too much." Sounds spooky. However, he clarified that it meant that the research labs received funding from NAIAD. That is not a benefit. That is the general way most science is supported. If there is any reason to believe that something has been done with the boat in the budget, we have not seen any of your evidence.
Do the FDA and Big Pharma ban cheap drugs as a way to make money?
Mikovits says pharmaceutical companies are only interested in drugs that can cost and charge a ton of money. It is true that pharma & # 39; business companies involve rising drug prices, and patents, but Mikovits is sadly miserable considering that drug companies need to consult with the FDA to pull cheap drugs from the market to make this happen. When a drug is active, the obvious move is to enjoy increased demand and more charging.
I mean we know this. Remember daraprim, the drug its price Martin Shkreli hurts? It's yet to be made about $ 700 a pill, retail price (less per coupon, but that's about it a complete racket) and is not copyrighted at all. Epinephrine does not have a patent, but look at the price of Epi-Pens.
Charging a ton of drugs is common, and totally legal. You don't need a fake to explain.
As for his specific requests: Mikovits talks about a cheap, old-fashioned suramin drug that is said to cure autism. The actual results of the case were not as he describes.
He also cites hydroxychloroquine as a reduced-dose COVID-19 treatment. In fact, there are 169 trials of it currently underway. It is so widely used in baldness that delivery of people who need it in some cases, such as lupus, is at risk. And besides his claims in this video, there is no strong evidence that it works—It is a hope.
Here's the truth: The company that makes remdesivir, one of the most promising drugs COVID-19, will probably charge a ridiculous amount per dose just because they can. No conspiracy required: That is how our system is developed. Anyone who thinks that Big Pharma needs conspiracy in order to make money doesn't care how Big Pharma actually works.
Does wearing a mask make us more vulnerable to coronavirus?
No. The video states that masks "renew" the virus. What evidence is there? Nothing. (This is, by the way, a specific claim that Facebook is talking about removing the video as false. "Suggesting that wearing a mask can make you sick may result in imminent harm, and therefore remove the video," the company she told the New York Times.)
Does staying inside weaken our immune system?
No. Why? There is a perception that exposure to bacteria while children grow up it may affect their physical function as adults, but there is no known factor when body dysfunction decreases when we live inside. There are many germs inside our houses, however
In this way, the doctors quoted in this part of the video are Dr. Daniel Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi of Bakersfield, California. The plandemic makes it look as if the two are talking to many doctors, sharing common opinion, but that's not the case. The American Academy of Emergency Medicine (AAEM) and the American College of Emergency Physician (ACEP) have released a statement in which they "strongly and firmly" shared the doctors' video (which was published, before the Plandemic issue) with a false emphasis.
Can a flu vaccine make you more susceptible to coronavirus?
Not that we know anything. No studies have been conducted on influenza vaccine and COVID-19, and studies have looked at the effects of influenza vaccines on flu (some of them caused by other members of the coronavirus family) obtained mixed results.
Are COVID-19 mortality rates going up?
It is difficult to know the exact numbers, but since the tests are not yet widely available, we may be subject to overweight.
However, this is a simple question. You don't need test results to see that deaths from all causes have occurred since the onset of the epidemic, in all countries.
Do hospitals get more money if they get a patient with COVID-19 or put them on a ventilator?
Yes, because hospitals charge more for treatments that require additional resources. COVID-19 hospitalized patients are often sicker and longer in hospital than patients in other cases. When Mikovits talks about Medicare giving hospitals $ 13,000 for COVID-19 patients, it's not a gift or a bonus. It's the price tag they care about.
Is this idea of unity coming together?
Here’s the funny thing: no.
I listened carefully to the part where Mikovits – or anyone else – explained why and how this epidemic was organized (because it's a claim, right? Plandemic?). I was waiting to see how complicated the concept was, how hard it would be to break it apart. It should be good, right?
This is all we get. Mikovits says:
The game is to prevent herbs until everyone gets infected, and then press the vaccine.
What kind of master plan is that? When everyone is infected, no one needs the vaccine. On the flip side, if you were using effective treatments now, in fact everyone would buy them. If you deploying the virus as a quick rich scheme, wouldn't you start selling the drug ASAP?
There is something else, too, and it is a mistake in all conspiracy theories: how do you get it all a pharma company and all a world government on the grift? How do you find out one Is the government prioritizing unity in the matter?
The White House and the CDC would not agree in need of a coronavirus crew. And should we believe that our government is not only following one system, but also interacting with many pharmaceutical companies, and working closely with governments worldwide?
Once you've figured it out, you'll see this in a moment. Did they use a gun that stops Fauci predicting the epidemic to say he started it? Or it is very possible that anyone who studies infectious diseases may know that the epidemic is always around the corner, and are we better prepared? There have been some outbreaks in the past – it's not like the Black Death escaped the biosafety lab – and there will be more in the future. Truth is stranger than fiction, and there is no need to make a literary style to make it appear true.
Table of Contents