It may sound weird, but the first graphics cards to hit the market with PCIe 4.0 will not be the RTX 3000, not the new Tesla. And that if NVIDIA doesn’t fix it and changes the deadline, newcomers to the company will come to compete with Intel and its Intel
Mature refers to a much faster market than the medium and high-end GPUs, as the speed is currently printed by AMD and Intel with their APUs.
NVIDIA is working hard on the sequel to follow in the MX300 series
” alt=”NVIDIA-Turing-MX-3″ width=”1200″ height=”664″ data-src=”https://igamesnews.com/app/uploads-igamesnews.com/2020/04/NVIDIA-Turing-MX-3.jpg” />
Well, NVIDIA will replace all the grilled meat with its new MX (MX400 perhaps?), Which was seen under the code name N18S-G5 and there will be quite a few claims apparently.
After the fiasco that created the MX300 series which included the Pascal build and which is far from the choice of AMD as the APU for Ryzen 9 4900HNVIDIA prepares for the next attack against its two rivals, where in the case of AMD we will certainly see the construction of Navi and possibly some units supported by Ray Tracing and also RDNA 2 (it is not as if RDNA 1 will be saved), while Intel will be coming in Xe, which will provide and support this technology.
So, NVIDIA is moving the tab and will be offering its new “models” for new models of TU117 cores, the chips directly from the GTX 1650 will be cut often to convert the cards into 25 Watt Max TDP.
Testing with PCIe 4.0? Why now
” alt=”NVIDIA-Turing-MX-2 ” data-src=”https://igamesnews.com/app/uploads-igamesnews.com/2020/04/NVIDIA-Turing-MX-2.jpg” data-srcset=” https://igamesnews.com/app/uploads-igamesnews.com/2020/04/NVIDIA-Turing-MX-2 .jpg 631w, https://igamesnews.com/app/uploads-igamesnews.com/2020/04/NVIDIA-Turing-MX-2-229×300.jpg 229w ” />
It’s a great question. The GTX 1650 obviously doesn’t require much higher bandwidth for PCIe 4.0, in fact, it doesn’t even reach half the PCIe 3.0 bandwidth, so why install PCIe 4.0? It’s not even clear.
It is possible that NVIDIA estimates that laptops will leave PCIe 3.0 aside to give access to PCIe 4.0, either pure marketing to rival its competitors or it may be because on some computers the PCIe and GPU lines will be limited by CPUs and SSDs should be distributed, requiring this for a broad band range.
In any case, preliminary data indicates that this new MX will come with it 5 GHz GDDR6 or 3.5 GHz GDDR5 (the option is almost eliminated by industry limitations with these memories) and in two different formats: 960 balls and 603 balls, showing at least two well-separated SKUs.
” alt=”NVIDIA-Turing-MX ” data-src=”https://igamesnews.com/app/uploads-igamesnews.com/2020/04/NVIDIA-Turing-MX.jpg” data-srcset=” https://igamesnews.com/app/uploads-igamesnews.com/2020/04/NVIDIA-Turing-MX.jpg 990w, https://igamesnews.com/app/uploads-igamesnews.com/2020/04/NVIDIA-Turing-MX-283×300.jpg 283w, https://igamesnews.com/app/uploads-igamesnews.com/2020/04 /NVIDIA-Turing-MX-965×1024.jpg 965w, https://igamesnews.com/app/uploads-igamesnews.com/2020/04/NVIDIA-Turing-MX-768×815.jpg 768w ” />
Working wisely, they are expected to be close to GTX 1650 Max-Q, so we’re talking about a good increase in performance and if the same values are maintained, it can also be a good option for thinking against the GPUs from AMD and Intel.
Whatever happens, it seems that NVIDIA has to get into the accelerator and this is undoubtedly a sign that AMD and Intel are going to hit hard, so this year’s end is very exciting for ultrabooks, since jumping the performance of those who don’t want to spend a fortune. on Mobile Hardware it will be significant and certainly at the same price as we see today Ryzen 4000 with Comet Lake-S or Ice Lake-S.